Bruce Coleman Mortgage Brokers

604-688-6002

Deutsche Bank reveals 7 reasons why ‘Canada is in serious trouble,’ starting with a 63% overvalued housing market

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

Deutsche Bank’s chief international economist Torsten Sløk has circulated a chart deck looking at global housing markets, and Canada stands out as having quite a few problems.

According to the report, homes in Canada are 63 per cent overvalued, greater than the 50 per cent levels in Australia and Norway, Deutsche Bank AG said in a report Thursday.image

Values in Canada are 35 per cent higher when the median house price is compared to the median household income than the historical average and 91 per cent higher compared with average rentals.

Related New American Homes Are Bigger Today Than They Were During The Housing Bubble Why We Should All Love The Suburbs The 25 Cheapest Housing Markets In America Sløk dedicated seven charts to the country.

Simply put, debt levels are very high, and with sky-high home prices cooling off, we could see pressure on the Canadian financial system and the labor markets.

While US households have been deleveraging since the Great Recession, Canadian household debt as a percent of household income is higher than ever:

Torsten Slok/Deutsche Bank

The mortgage credit market has been slowing down, which is a bad sign for the housing market:

Torsten Slok/Deutsche Bank

Other forms of debt have also been exploding, while income has grown at a much slower rate:

Torsten Slok/Deutsche Bank

Construction of houses has been level over the last decade, while multifamily units like apartments have reached record highs:

Torsten Slok/Deutsche Bank

Canada’s biggest housing market, Toronto, has been slowing down over the last couple years:

Torsten Slok/Deutsche Bank

Meanwhile, Canada’s West Coast metropolis of Vancouver has held steady:

Torsten Slok/Deutsche Bank

Any difficulty in the Canadian housing market could bleed over into the larger economy, since construction is a much larger part of Canadian employment than US employment:

Sales of Canadian homes worth over $1M grew substantially last year and will again in 2015

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

TORONTO — Sales of homes worth over $1 million increased in four major Canadian real estate markets last year, according to a report released by Sotheby’s International Realty on Wednesday.

The Toronto area saw year-over-yearimage sales growth of 38 per cent, while sales of Vancouver’s high-end homes rose by 25 per cent from the previous year.

Canadian housing bulls are joining real estate doubters as warnings and oil collapse sink in

Canadians who last year brushed off predictions of a real estate slowdown and kept buying houses are increasingly joining the doubters.

The nation’s households are the least optimistic since May 2013 that home prices will keep rising, according to weekly polling data compiled by Nanos Research for Bloomberg. Keep reading. Growing demand and limited supply cut down the number of days that homes stayed on the market and increased the percentage of homes in both markets that sold over the asking price, the report said. Sales grew by a “more modest” 16 per cent in Calgary and 21 per cent in Montreal, according to the study.

That trend is expected to continue into 2015, with demand to outstrip supply in the Greater Toronto Area and in Vancouver. Meanwhile, the high-end real estate markets in Montreal and Calgary are expected to be balanced, according to the Sotheby’s analysis.

The report notes that oil prices, which have fallen by 55 per cent since the summer due to a supply glut, could have an impact on sales of high-end homes in Calgary.

“We’re really watching Calgary very closely,” Sotheby’s president and chief executive Ross McCredie said in an interview. “There’s fear out there in terms of what 2015 is going to look like if oil stays where it is today.”

So far, the number of homes being sold has continued to grow in Calgary’s high-end real estate market. McCredie said while buyers may begin holding off to get a sense of where oil prices are headed, it’s unlikely that Calgary’s real estate market will go flat.

Related As Vancouver home prices surge out of reach, businesses worry how to retain staff Houses might not be as overvalued as the Bank of Canada thinks, Moody’s report suggests “Definitely in the later part of last year you saw a lot of people waiting,” he said. “A lot of transactions didn’t end up closing or deals fell apart. I think they’re all just taking a cautious look at it.”

If oil remains below $50 a barrel, that could spell trouble for Alberta’s real estate sector in general, including in the high-end segment, McCredie said.

“Six months later, if oil’s still at $50 or less, I think you’re going to start to see some really concerned people there,” he said.

McCredie also said that foreign investors are snatching up roughly half of the homes worth $5 million or more in Vancouver and Toronto, despite a recent report from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. that puts the foreign ownership numbers much lower.

The CHMC report last month found that foreigners own only 2.4 per cent of the condos for rent in Toronto and 2.3 per cent in Vancouver.

While the CHMC report noted that some areas of Vancouver and Toronto had a higher proportion of foreign condo owners — as high as 5.8 per cent in parts of Vancouver and 4.3 per cent in Toronto’s centre core — it’s still much lower than the estimated 50 per cent foreign ownership that McCredie says exists in the luxury real estate market in those two cities.

“It’s not an exact science,” McCredie said. “It’s not like you can literally say, ‘Well there’s X number,’ because what we see a lot is the transaction for foreigners buying Canadian real estate happens through Canadian subcompanies.”

Since many of the sales take place through Canadian companies owned by foreign individuals or corporations, those transactions wouldn’t be captured in the CMHC data, McCredie said. Sotheby’s, which markets and brokers the sales of luxury homes, is in a better position to gauge the level of foreign ownership, at least in the over $1 million market.

Some critics have raised concerns that a mass selloff of foreign-owned properties could crash Canada’s real estate market in an economic downturn.

But McCredie says strong underlying factors, such as historically low mortgage rates and high levels of immigration, continue to make Canadian real estate attractive to foreign buyers.

“They’ve got a lot of money right now. They see Canada as a very stable marketplace. They like the story around Canada. They like coming here. They have friends and family here.”

Oil prices are making housing forecasts a tough call in Alberta

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

Plunging oil prices have made it almost too difficult to predict what will happen in the Calgary housing market, according to a new real estate forecast.

As Vancouver home prices surge out of reach, businesses worry how to retain staff

Business groups are raising the alarimagem about Vancouver’s ability to attract and retain the talent needed to foster local successes like retailer Lululemon Athletica or tech startups like video surveillance maker Avigilon Corp and social media manager Hootsuite. Keep reading. “Continued uncertainty in the oil market will impact Calgary real estate over $1 million, however, the degree of influence is still unknown. If employment and migration into the city remain at expected levels, sales are expected to remain on pace into early 2015,” said Sotheby’s International Realty Canada in a report on what it calls top-tier housing.

Ross McCredie, president and chief executive of Sotheby’s in Canada, says 2015 could continue to be a strong year for real estate if interest rates remain low. The Bank of Canada has not raised its overnight lending rate for more than four years.

Alberta is the one place where there is a lot of wait-and-see right now “There’s nothing that I’ve seen from any of the banks [indicating that the Bank of Canada is going to raise rates] and even if it went up one, two or three percentage points, that’s cheap money historically,” said Mr. McCredie. The prime rate at most financial institutions, which variable rate loans are tied to, is 3% and most consumers are able to negotiate discounts off that rate.

The exception to the Sotheby’s forecast might be Calgary where $1 million-plus sales were up 16% in 2014 from a year earlier. “Alberta is the one place where there is a lot of wait-and-see right now. This time last year no one saw this,” said Mr. McCredie, referring to the drop in oil prices. “For most of our clients, they’re upper end [and] they’ve really made a lot of money. There’s a lot of blue-eyed sheiks coming out of Alberta. They’ve diversified in their investments and you won’t see a panic.”

Related Sales of Canadian homes worth over $1M grew substantially last year and will again in 2015 Canadian housing bulls are joining real estate doubters as warnings and oil collapse sink in The Calgary Real Estate Board said last week that 2014 sales jumped 9.3% from a year earlier. The average sale price for the year was $483,079, a 5.8% increase from a year earlier.

Sotheby’s said Montreal’s high-end market has had a strong recovery because of a return to political stability. Sales of homes worth $1 million or more were up 21% in 2014 from 2013. “The whole sovereignty question is off the table now,” said Mr. McCredie.

The real estate company, which only looked at Montreal, Calgary, Toronto and Vancouver in the report, says Toronto should have the most momentum in the $1 million-plus category in 2015.

“Once considered luxury and therefore a more limited market segment, $1-2 million dollar homes are now sought after by average homebuyers seeking conventional single family homes within city limits,” said Sotheby’s referring to both Toronto and Vancouver.

As Vancouver home prices surge out of reach, businesses worry how to retain staff

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

1229vancouverVANCOUVER — When Allan Pulga, a communications manager, found out he was going to be a father, he had to make a tough choice — stay in a tiny downtown condo or leave Vancouver.

First-time homebuyers are feeling the weight of Canada’s housing boom

Bank of CanadaWith rising home prices and hefty student debts, more first-timers are being locked out of the market. What they need is a strategy The 34-year-old, who works for fast-growing private Canadian technology firm iQmetrix, packed his bags and moved to Regina, Saskatchewan, where the typical family home costs roughly one third of the price in the Greater Vancouver area.

“When you’re a young, single person, you can make Vancouver work financially,” said Pulga, who was able to transfer to iQmetrix’s Regina office. “But I feel like if it’s time to settle down and have kids, maybe you won’t stay.”

Pulga typifies a worrying trend in Vancouver, where sky-high housing prices are forcing many young professionals out of the city and into long commutes from far-flung suburbs, with some choosing just to leave the region altogether.

That has business groups raising the alarm about Vancouver’s ability to attract and retain the talent needed to foster local successes like retailer Lululemon Athletica or tech startups like video surveillance maker Avigilon Corp and social media manager Hootsuite.

Vancouver has long boasted Canada’s costliest housing. But low interest rates and strong foreign demand, especially from Chinese buyers, have helped drive the cost of a typical detached home up nearly 30% in the last five years.

The average Vancouver-area property — including houses, town homes and condos — sold for $828,937 in November, compared with $580,326 in greater Toronto and $306,541 in Regina, according to the Canadian Real Estate Association. In Seattle, on the West Coast of the U.S., with massive employers such as Boeing, Microsoft and Amazon in the area, the median sale price was $436,250.

On Vancouver’s desirable west side, the median selling price for detached homes rose to $2.6 million in November.

Related Sizzling Vancouver home sales likely to fuel national bubble debate Toronto and Vancouver home prices pass Rome and close in on Paris SQUEEZED OUT

Government data shows the migration of 25 to 44-year-olds out of Vancouver to other provinces has outpaced those migrating in from elsewhere in Canada over the past three years, eroding a key working-age demographic.

“Housing prices are a concern for that exact reason,” said Ken Peacock, chief economist at the Business Council of British Columbia. “It makes it more challenging for younger people starting a family.”

Vancouver’s expensive housing also makes it tough for companies to bring in new talent from other regions, in particular senior executives, he noted.

“There is a sticker shock phenomenon,” said Peacock. “A lot of these people are coming from 5,000-square-foot estates and here they get a three bedroom bungalow.”

To be sure, Vancouver is not alone. New York, London and Singapore have long been popular with foreign investors, driving up the cost of living for locals. But while those cities are global financial hubs and have many bankers with big compensation, Vancouver’s economy relies more on tourism and a cyclical resources industry.

There is a sticker shock phenomenon. A lot of these people are coming from 5,000-square-foot estates and here they get a three bedroom bungalow The median family income in Vancouver in 2012, the last data available, was just $71,140 a year, the lowest of any major city in Canada, putting home ownership far out of reach for most. The median income in Regina, by comparison, was $91,200, while Toronto families make just a bit more than Vancouver families.

Vancouver is working to address the affordability gap, but existing initiatives mainly target lower-income families. Renting is a cheaper option in the city of 1.3 million, with small 2-bedroom downtown condos listed for about $2,000 a month and suburban basement units available at $1,200.

Despite the challenges, numerous companies interviewed by Reuters said most of their staff are willing to make sacrifices — like long commutes or raising kids in shoebox condos — for the benefit of Vancouver’s mild climate and outdoor lifestyle.

But those same companies, such as Vancouver-based retailer Mountain Equipment Co-op, also had examples of key hires who ultimately turned down jobs because of the high home prices.

It’s an issue Craig Hemer, an executive recruiter with Boyden, has been grappling with for the better part of a decade.

Hemer has learned ways to soften the blow — selling older executives on the idea of downsizing to a luxurious downtown condo and convincing those with families that suburban life offers more amenities for kids.

LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT

Companies too are shifting their policies, with some offering car allowances and transit subsidies. Others are opening small suburban offices or allow staff to telecommute from home.

But that isn’t always enough, especially in Vancouver’s startup scene. Executives say it is easy enough to hire junior staff, but a dearth of experienced engineers and technology workers makes it hard to grow past a certain point.

“There’s just not enough high caliber people here. They all leave when they realize they can make more money in other cities and live there for cheaper,” said Simeon Garratt, chief executive of Spark CRM, a property-focused tech startup.

“We debate at least once a month whether we should just move to Toronto.”

© Thomson Reuters 2014 LATEST PERSONAL FINANCE VIDEOS

House shopping in Toronto, Calgary, Vancouver? They’re desperation cities

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

Toronto. Calgary. Vancouver. They’re all Desperation City as far as young people trying to afford a house are concerned.

The theme in housing market forecasts for 2015 so far is steady pricing. Some markets will more or less be flat, while the Big Three markets could rise 3 to 4 per cent. What more could go wrong if you’re struggling to save enough money to buy a first home? Here’s something: You buy aimagend then have to deal with a shock to the economy. Something like a plunge in oil prices that undermines growth and hurts the job market, for example.

MORE RELATED TO THIS STORY

ROB CARRICK What can home buyers learn from stock market jitters? The 10-year rule THE LONG VIEW Why Canadians should consider Poloz’s overvalued housing warning ROB CARRICK How the housing market beats up on first-time buyers

CARRICK TALKS MONEY Video: Carrick Talks Money: Should young adults buy a condo as a first home?

CARRICK TALKS MONEY Video: Carrick Talks Money: Can you really afford a house?

VIDEO Video: What $6-million buys you in Montreal’s real estate market In a column earlier this week, I argued that anyone buying a house today should plan to live in it for a decade to ride through any price decline that could happen in the years ahead . Now for some advice specifically aimed at young buyers who despair of price declines ever happening and wonder if they should buy now, before affordability deteriorates further. If affording a house is at all a stretch for you financially, step back from the housing market and keep saving. Let’s talk again in a year.

Some insight on the financial situation of young homeowners was contained in the much-publicized Bank of Canada report estimating that house prices may be as much as 30 per cent overvalued. First off, the bank says the current generation of young people who own a house carry more mortgage debt relative to income than previous generations did at the same age. So why should young people not simply go with the flow and take on larger mortgages to buy houses? Because the more they owe, the more vulnerable they are to, in the bank’s words, “negative shocks to income and to higher interest rates.”

Let’s look at the rate risk first. There are so many cross-currents in the global economy today that it’s tougher than ever to know what will happen. The U.S. seems to be improving, but China’s growth rate is slowing and both Japan and Europe aren’t in great shape. Falling oil prices are negative for Canada’s economy, although there are offsets in the form of a falling dollar that helps feed exports. Bottom line, rate increases of any consequence seem unlikely. If there’s an interest rate surprise next year, it could turn out to be a rate cut.

Income shocks are a bigger deal, and not just because of the trickle-down effect on the economy of sliding oil prices. In fact, the young adults of Generation Y are already dealing with precarious incomes. With temporary work becoming increasingly common, Gen Y lives under constant threat of the sort of income shock that comes when a contract expires without another one at hand.

TD Economics issued a report last week on youth employment in Canada and said job market conditions for this group are not as bad as some commentators say . However, even in this little-to-worry-about narrative, two concerns were raised. One is that there’s evidence of young people being underemployed relative to their level of education, and the other is an increasing share of temporary work for this demographic.

The Bank of Canada itself notes that young households are more vulnerable than average to economic downturns. If it’s also true that young people are carrying more mortgage debt than previous generations, it stands to reason that a weaker economy would hit them exceptionally hard.

The Real Life Ratio, introduced in a column earlier this year , will help you figure out how much house you can afford and still meet other financial obligations such as daycare and saving for retirement. If your score’s in the green zone, then you’re good to go (remember the 10-year rule, though). If not, then postpone your purchase.

People have always felt they were taking a big leap into the unknown when they bought first homes, but things are different today. In pointing out that today’s young households carry more mortgage debt than previous generations, the Bank of Canada confirms this.

A higher risk level for young homeowners requires more intense preparation to buy. If you’re a millennial stretching to afford a home, consider using 2015 to save a bigger down payment and practise living on a tight budget. One more year living in Desperation City won’t do you any harm, and it may do you some good if the central bank is right about how overvalued house prices could be.

**

Can you afford to buy?

A quick tutorial on house affordability for first-time buyers:

1. Do not rely on what the bank says you can afford: Banks look at whether you have the means to repay what you borrow, not at how well you’ll be able to balance your mortgage and other financial obligations.

2. Remember to consider daycare costs: They’re a huge factor in household budgeting and should be considered by home buyers even before they have kids.

3. Leave room for savings: If you can’t save roughly 10 per cent of your gross pay after you buy a house, you have too big a mortgage.

4. Maintenance costs add up: A rough estimate is 1 per cent of the value of your home per year, on average.

5. Mind those condo fees: If you live in a condo, your monthly fees could easily rise at more than the inflation rate every year.

Rob Carrick (more…)

What can mortgage shoppers expect in 2015? Here are five predictions

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

1. More mortgage restrictions to come With Ottawa paring down its mortgage exposure, the Bank of Canada estimating up to 30 per cent overvaluation in Canada’s housing market, over-indebted consumers and average home prices incessantly breaking records, policy makers will restrict the mortgage market yetimage again. New limits on government-backed mortgage funding will make it more expensive for lenders to fund mortgages, or new underwriting rules will make it harder to qualify for a mortgage. Maybe both.

MORE RELATED TO THIS STORY

THE LONG VIEW Why Canadians should consider Poloz’s overvalued housing warning DECODING THE MORTGAGE MARKET A cheaper, under-the-radar mortgage option: credit unions DECODING THE MORTGAGE MARKET Mortgage shopping? Two stars and four dogs from today’s market

CARRICK TALKS MONEY Video: Carrick Talks Money: Troubling news on mortgage rates

CARRICK TALKS MONEY Video: Carrick Talks Money: The price war in home equity lines of credit

CARRICK TALKS MONEY Video: Carrick Talks Money: The mortgage that marries you to your lender 2. Record discounts for variable mortgage rates Lenders’ funding costs should continue to improve for variable-rate mortgages in the next twelve months. As a result, we’ll see a small number of lenders and/or brokers advertising discounts better than prime minus one per cent before the end of 2015.

3. Brokers will break into three camps Mortgage brokers will split into three camps in 2015: Full-service brokers who create detailed mortgage plans to support one’s financial goals, online mortgage brokers who provide less advice for a lower rate, and your run-of-the-mill everyday broker. That latter type will suffer job losses in 2015 as their rates and service offerings prove uncompetitive relative to other brokers, banks and credit unions.

4. A glut of private money Alternative mortgage lenders – such as mortgage investment corporations (MICs) – will grow flush with cash, as investors chase higher yields and as Ottawa’s stricter mortgage rules create opportunity for them. That abundance of capital will motivate sub-prime lenders to take more risk in search of higher returns. In turn, we’ll see some of them offer mortgages with only 10 or 15 per cent down, instead of the traditional 20 to 25 per cent equity The result: Credit-challenged consumers will have more lending options at lower interest rates.

5. Brokers will pitch you other stuff Don’t be surprised if your mortgage broker offers you other financial products. Declining margins will motivate many brokers to diversify their revenue streams. They’ll take a page from banks’ playbooks and cross-sell you everything from GICs, to insurance, to credit cards, to RRSPs.

Robert McLister is a mortgage planner at intelliMortgage Inc. and founder of RateSpy.com.

MORE RELATED TO THIS STORY

DECODING THE MORTGAGE MARKET How to avoid borrower remorse when mortgage rates drop ROB CARRICK If buying a house is a financial stretch, keep saving ROB CARRICK How the housing market beats up on first-time buyers ROB CARRICK Young urban condo buyers: Why not rent instead?

Family dreams of leaving city for less expensive life in small town

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

For city-dwellers such as Iris and Ryan, the birth of a first child often prompts thoughts of leaving urban living behind for less-expensive digs in a small town where they will be closer to family.

But is it worth the likely drop in iimagencome and diminished job prospects?

Iris, who is on mat leave with a three-month old baby, has a management job grossing $107,000 a year. Ryan brings in $50,000 annually working as a house painter. They are planning to have a second child and wonder if Iris can afford to work part time to spend more time with the children.

MORE RELATED TO THIS STORY

FINANCIAL FACELIFT Couple hopes to keep early retirement plans despite job loss FINANCIAL FACELIFT A family moves back to Canada: ‘We don’t know where to begin’ FINANCIAL FACELIFT Young family craves vacation retreat, but should they wait?

CARRICK TALKS MONEY Video: Carrick Talks Money: Why variable mortgages are the way to go this spring

CARRICK TALKS MONEY Video: Carrick Talks Money: Better savings habits in three words – deducted at source

CARRICK TALKS MONEY Video: Carrick Talks Money: A savings report card for Canadians She is 34, he is 38.

“We are considering moving to a smaller community to be closer to family and use the equity in our home to be either mortgage-free or close to it,” Ryan writes in an e-mail. “Is this a good idea?” he asks. They value their home at $675,000. They bring in $8,400 a year renting out their basement apartment, which they would continue to do in their new house if they moved.

They are concerned about earning and saving enough to pay for their children’s higher education and to maintain their current standard of living when they retire. Neither has a work pension plan. “How much will we need to set aside annually?” Ryan asks. He is hoping to retire by age 60.

We asked Jason Pereira, a financial planner and investment adviser at Bennett March/IPC Investment Corp. in Toronto, to look at Iris and Ryan’s situation.

What the expert says

Selling their home and moving to a smaller town makes sense financially provided they can find work in the new location, Mr. Pereira says. It would also enable Iris and Ryan to pay down a fair amount of debt.

But there is a risk: It will lower their income substantially and may limit their career opportunities, the adviser says.

“If Iris is confident she can earn the $50,000 that she has projected, then they can be confident the move will not affect their ability to meet their desired goals,” he says.

They can use some of the proceeds from the house sale to pay off their debts and help fund their savings, Mr. Pereira says. Their new home will cost about $500,000, so they will have to take a mortgage of about $200,000.

“Once the move has been made, they can use all cash flow [after RRSP and registered education saving plan contributions] to pay down the mortgage. They will be debt-free in 11 years,” he estimates. He suggests they contribute $5,000 a year to each of their registered retirement savings plans (currently only Iris has one), rising with inflation. Once the mortgage has been paid off, any free cash flow should go first to their tax-free savings accounts (yet to be opened) and then to a joint investment account.

By the time they retire in 2036, they should have $840,000 in their RRSPs, $523,000 in their TFSAs and $80,710 in their joint investment account, Mr. Pereira estimates. This assumes an average annual rate of return on their investments of 7.4 per cent, or 4.27 per cent after subtracting inflation.

He recommends they open an RESP to take full advantage of the federal education savings grant, contributing $5,000 in 2015 to make up for not contributing in 2014. This will result in a government grant of $1,000. (The grant is 20 per cent for the first $2,500 you save in your child’s RESP each year, or $500, up to a maximum of $7,200 for each child.)

Starting in 2016, they should contribute $2,500 a year until the child reaches age 14 (that’s per child, taking into account their plans for a second). The year after that, he suggests they contribute $1,000 each. This will bring the total for each child up to $7,200.

Assuming the savings grow by 5 per cent a year, the children should have about $160,000 available to them. This will cover about three and a quarter years of schooling, so the rest could come from Iris and Ryan’s TFSAs or general cash flow. Mr. Pereira’s calculations assume tuition of $8,000 a year, rising by 8 per cent a year, and expenses of $1,000 a month for each child.

So can they get by if Iris makes $50,000 a year in the new location? The calculations assume Ryan makes $50,000 a year after the move as well.

Yes, their goals are achievable, Mr. Pereira says. For Iris, to work part-time in their city location could put a squeeze on their finances and endanger their goals, he adds. He notes they are short on insurance and recommends they get as much disability insurance as they can, especially since Iris is planning to change jobs and her new employer may not offer it.

***

Client situation:

The people: Iris, 34, Ryan, 38, and their three-month-old child.

The problem: Does it make sense to move to a smaller town to reduce their debt load sooner and improve their cash flow?

The plan: Sell the city home and buy in the smaller town. Pay down all debt except for a $200,000 mortgage. Plan to have the mortgage paid off in 11 years or so.

The payoff: Plenty of money for the children’s education and their own retirement.

Monthly net income: $5,885

Assets: Cash $13,000; her RRSP $45,000; residence $675,000. Total: $733,000

Monthly disbursements: Mortgage $1,300; property tax, insurance, utilities $650; transportation $430; groceries, clothing $450; home equity line of credit $200; gifts $50; vacation, travel $200; dining, drinks, entertainment $350; clubs, sports $140; grooming $25; pets $75; other personal discretionary $100; health and dental insurance $125; cellphones $125; TV, Internet $115. Total: $4,335

Liabilities: Mortgage $280,000; HELOC $28,000; family loan $25,000. Total: $333,000

MORE RELATED TO THIS STORY

HOME FINANCE Cash-poor but house-rich retiree? The pros and cons of reverse mortgages

How to get your own ‘Vacation House For Free,’ according to this HGTV host

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

HGTV host Matt Blashaw thinks the chief appeal of a vacation home is its convenience.

“It’s an easy vacation,” he explains. “The point is just to go have everything set up the way yoimageu want. You know the area, and you know you’re going to have fun.”

The vacation may be easy, but the second mortgage probably isn’t.

For that reason, Blashaw helps families on his show, “Vacation House For Free,” renovate under-the-weather homes into retreats worth renting out when the family isn’t in residence.

Of course, no house is actually free, but by earning money on the home when it would otherwise be vacant, homeowners can essentially get a vacation house that pays for itself.

“You’re contributing to your wealth and your future,” Blashaw says, “not throwing your money away on Hilton and Marriott. You’re building equity in what I think is the best investment anyone can have, which is real estate. Plus, people want to have a place they can retire to, so it’s a win-win.”

It’s not quite as easy as it sounds, especially if you’ve never undertaken a renovation. Here, Blashaw provides his top tips for turning your vacation home into a free home.

Related This 71-Year-Old Makes Up To $8,500 A Month Teaching Online Classes Here’s Why You Shouldn’t Let Your Credit Card Expire What 9 Successful People Wish They’d Known About Money In Their 20s Buy in a popular location.

Sure, homes are cheaper in under-the-radar locations, but if no one wants to go there, no one will want to rent your house. “The idea of the house is you want to be able to find a vacation home in a place that people want to go to,” explains Blashaw. “You want it to be popular. We’ve been to Cape Cod, Long Beach Island, Maine, the Florida Keys, Lake Tahoe.”

Choose a town that’s relatively easy to get to.

Bora Bora might be a great place to take a vacation, but it’s a little remote for a vacation home. “The thing I’ve been noticing with the show is that people want to take a vacation close to home,” Blashaw says, “typically within a couple hours drive. I think that’s simply because trying to put a family on a plane is a nightmare.”

Realize that you might not be able to use it during the high season.

Flickr / Mt. Hood Territory

Your vacation home should be in a popular area, like a ski resort.

Depending on your area, Blashaw says, there might be a busy season of 10-16 weeks — and you might need to rent during that time. “People have to be OK with not being there during the season,” cautions Blashaw.

“You can get the most weekly rental rate and the most people desiring the property. Your vacation home isn’t for free unless you have people in it!” he says. There’s a bright side, however: “A lot of people who own vacation homes don’t even want to be there in the high season because it’s so crowded.”

Scout the most popular local rentals.

Figure out what renters in the area want, so you can give it to them. “If you’re looking in an area you want to buy a vacation home, go tour the house that’s a really popular rental,” recommends Blashaw. “What makes it so popular? Proximity to the beach or water activities? How it’s decorated? The kitchen? See what they did to find out what renters in those areas want, then take those ideas and put them into your rental. Make sure you know what rents out all the time so your house will rent out all the time.”

Blashaw notes that you can check listings online at sites like VRBO to see which houses tend to be booked solid, then call the property managers to schedule a tour — or even just go through their photos.

Do the math.

Your vacation home isn’t free if you’re not earning enough to offset the money you put into it. Blashaw recommends calculating the carrying cost, mortgage, taxes, utilities, insurance, and any other costs on an annual basis.

“Then you need to renovate and figure out how many weeks you need to rent at x dollars to have your vacation house for free,” Blashaw explains.

Don’t think you have to renovate the whole place.

Flickr / Ian Gratton

Renters should feel just as at home as you do.

While you might be tempted to gut the place, Blashaw recommends being mindful about your renovation and starting with the highest priority areas.

“The rule of standard suburban houses is kitchen is king, then bathrooms, then bedrooms,” he says.

“In vacation rentals, I think it’s a little different. Bathrooms can be overlooked as long as they’re clean and fresh and functional. You need to put money in the decor in the living room, in the furniture to make it comfortable and cater to possibly multiple families with a ton of seating and dining space.”

And if you’re pressed for time (or money), Blashaw has one particular recommendation: “When people walk into a place, they want it to be fresh and clean,” he says. “Nothing will make a space seem cleaner and fresher a than a coat of paint.”

Plan to make renters’ lives as easy as possible.

Once your house is in renting shape, your priority is to fill it — and that can be as easy as putting up a listing on Airbnb, VRBO, or Homeaway.

Blashaw says that by making your house a pleasure to visit, you can ensure repeat renters. “I tell people, ‘If you’re by the beach, make it so that your renters don’t have to do anything but buy groceries and sit in the house.’ Buy a beach wagon, a paddle board, give them a list of restaurants and things they can do. You want your property to be a destination for them every year just like it is for you. I know couples now who don’t even have to market their properties anymore because they have ongoing rental agreements. You have to give them a reason to come back.”

U.S. rental home shortage lining the pockets of big corporate landlords

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

Corporate landlords are benefiting from the worst U.S. rental-housing shortage in more than a decade as construction trails demand and more Americans opt to lease rather than buy.

There’s an undersupply of single-family housesimage and apartments to rent for the first time since 2001, according to an analysis by Frank Nothaft, chief economist at mortgage buyer Freddie Mac, based on available inventory and historic vacancy rates. The deficit in the third quarter was about 350,000, the most in records dating back 14 years.

The shortage is giving the upper hand to institutional investors who spent more than US$25 billion since 2012 buying single-family homes to rent. While the market for apartments has been in favour of landlords for five years, owners of houses are now able to increase rents and reduce turnover to boost profits.

“It’s that supply-demand equation that allows us to get aggressive about raising rents,” Stephen Schmitz, chief executive officer of American Residential Properties Inc., a landlord with more than 8,500 homes, said at an investor conference this month. “Three years ago, you would go to raise somebody’s rent and they could say, ‘I’ll go down the street and pay US$100 less than I’m paying you now.’ But today they can’t because all those houses down the street are occupied.”

The U.S. rental-vacancy rate fell to 7.4% in the third quarter, according to Census Bureau data. The market is considered balanced, with neither landlords nor tenants having the upper hand when it comes to rents, at a vacancy rate of 8.2%, based on the average from 1994 through 2003, according to Freddie Mac’s Nothaft.

Related Billions flow into the hottest new U.S. housing asset — More young Americans leaving the parental nest, boosting housing recovery Rental rate increase good news for REITs Vacancies Shrink

The housing surplus peaked at almost 2 million units, including 1.2 million rentals, in the third quarter of 2009, when foreclosures were soaring and years of speculative construction led to a glut of empty houses.

“The surplus of vacant housing has shrunk over the last few years because there has been household growth and limited new construction,” Nothaft said in a telephone interview. “In most markets and in the national data, what we’ve observed is that rents have been rising faster than inflation.”

Rents on all single-family homes and multifamily units are expected to climb 3.5% next year, compared with a 2.5% increase for home purchase prices, according to estimates this month by Zillow Inc. Chief Economist Stan Humphries. The U.S. inflation rate was 1.3% in November, with a goal of 2% set by the Federal Reserve.

Wall Street-backed landlords already are enjoying higher rents for single-family homes in markets hit hardest by the housing crash, where they first started buying in bulk.

Rents Rise

The average monthly rent for a three-bedroom home in Phoenix surged more than 9% this year to US$1,158, data from Westminster, Colorado-based RentRange LLC show. Houses now lease about 10 days faster than apartments, according to a report this week from the Center for Real Estate Theory and Practice at Arizona State University.

In Las Vegas, rents on houses rose more than 3% to a median of US$1,248 in the 12 months through November, according to RentRange. In Orlando, Florida, they climbed 5% the same month to $1,294.

A reviving job market is driving household formation and fuelling demand for homes faster than builders are delivering them. In the Orlando area, for example, 56,000 jobs were added in the 12 months through October, benefiting landlords such as Aaron Edelheit, chief executive officer of Atlanta-based American Home, a rental company with 2,500 houses, including about 200 in central Florida.

Housing Shortage

“They’re not producing many entry-level homes,” he said in a telephone interview. “That’s what creates housing shortages, and it’s going to drive up the price of rents.”

Raising rents is likely to become a higher priority for institutional single-family landlords next year as they get a better grip on operations and how higher rates affect their pace of leasing, said Anthony Paolone, an analyst with JPMorgan Chase & Co. who follows real estate investment trusts including American Homes 4 Rent and Silver Bay Realty Trust Corp.

Investors have positioned themselves to house some of the former owners of 5 million homes lost to foreclosure since the real estate crash, according to research company CoreLogic Inc. Many of those former owners prefer houses over apartments because they want more space for their children and pets. Landlords also are getting a boost from some of the 75 million millennials — 18-to-34-year-olds — who are starting out as renters rather than buyers.

‘Bit Disillusioned’

The typical family renting a house from American Homes 4 Rent, an Agoura Hills, California-based REIT with more than 30,000 single-family homes, is in their mid-thirties with an annual income of US$80,400, enough to afford to buy if they wanted to, according to CEO David Singelyn.

“Many of these kids saw their parents lose their home, and they’re a little bit disillusioned,” Singelyn said at the Information Management Network Single Family Rental Investment Forum in Scottsdale, Arizona, on Dec. 4. “How long will that last? I don’t know. But today there’s a significant movement to becoming a renter nation as opposed to an owner nation.”

Those tenants often pay a premium to rent from new firms like American Homes 4 Rent, which mostly owns houses less than 12 years old near good schools and provides better service than mom-and-pop landlords, Singelyn said. They also move less often, with 68% of tenants opting to stay in the most recent quarter when their lease came up for renewal, compared with less than 50% for apartments, he said.

Blackstone’s Rents

Blackstone Group LP’s Invitation Homes, the largest single-family landlord, with more than 46,000 properties, as of Sept. 30 raised rents an average of 1.8% to US$1,474 from a year earlier on 3,200 homes that were financed through the industry’s first mortgage-backed security deal, according to Kroll Bond Rating Agency.

“We’ve seen strong demand for our homes in all 14 markets we operate,” said Denise Dunckel, a spokeswoman for Dallas-based Invitation Homes. “That’s just an indication that there’s a large market that likes the flexibility that renting provides.”

American Homes 4 Rent raised rents 3% on renewals and 4% for new tenants in the third quarter, Singelyn said during a Nov. 3 conference call. American Residential Properties increased rents an average of 3.4% from a year earlier on renewals, while Silver Bay’s rents rose 3% on renewals.

Seasonal Fluctuations

Some of the recent rent increases and reduced turnover may be a result of seasonality, with fewer people moving in late autumn and winter, said Jeff Brock, CEO of Key Property Services, a Marietta, Georgia-based real estate investment and management company he founded in 2001.

“People don’t move during the winter unless they have to,” said Brock. “If the increases we are getting in the seasonal tightness hold up this spring and summer, when vacancy cyclically increases, then you are seeing an institutional effect on the way rents are going.”

Single-family landlords also face limits on their ability to raise rents because tenants with expensive leases have more options than apartment renters, according to Dave Bragg, an analyst with Green Street Advisors Inc. in Newport Beach, California.

“Many apartment renters purposely pay a premium for convenience and superior sub-market locations,” Bragg wrote in report this week. “The highest-earning single-family renters will likely ultimately buy a single-family home.”

Family Affordability

While increasing rents may help the Wall-Street backed landlords, it may slow the recovery for families and communities hurt by the housing crash, according to Sarah Edelman, a policy analyst with the Center for American Progress, a Washington-based think tank aligned with Democrats.

“These companies can run profitable businesses without pushing rents higher than most families can afford,” she said.

Wall Street-backed firms have extended their purchasing even as property prices rise and low-cost foreclosures become harder to find, making it more important for them to charge higher rents to make a profit. Blackstone is spending as much as US$35 million a week on houses through Invitation Homes. While that’s down from last year’s peak of US$150 million a week, the company is still finding “attractive opportunities to invest,” Dunckel said.

Bulk Purchases

American Homes 4 Rent is spending US$500 million a quarter on property, an amount constrained by limits on the ability to raise capital.

The largest firms are buying some homes in bulk, snapping up pools from investors who began acquiring rental homes after values plunged 35% from their July 2006 peak and expected to sell when prices rebounded.

“We see lots of US$5 million, US$10 million and US$15 million portfolios,” David Miller, CEO of Silver Bay, said in an interview at the Scottsdale conference.

While walking from a panel discussion to the restroom, he was handed about 15 business cards from people interested in selling collections of homes.

“There’s still plenty of opportunity to buy,” he said.

Bloomberg News

CMHC finally releases foreign ownership data on housing — too bad few believe it

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

TORONTO • Foreign ownership in the housing market has become a bit of a bogeyman for people who fear a real estate collapse, so Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. set out to identify whether it really is an issue.

CMHC tackles foreign ownership in Canada’s housing market for first timeimage

Some pockets of the country now have as much as 6.9% of condominium apartments foreign-owned, according to a survey from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. on the rental market. Read more Now that the results are in, there’s just one problem: Few people believe them. The Crown corporation Tuesday published the first statistics on foreign ownership, based on its semi-annual rental survey. In the the 11 major markets tracked, there was a broad range, from a high of 2.4% in Toronto and 2.3% in Vancouver to a low of only one-tenth of a percentage point in several cities.

It found to find some pockets of the country, certain parts of Montreal, for example, had Canada’s highest concentration of rental condos under foreign ownership — at 6.9%.

“This is the first time we’ve done anything like this so it’s hard to draw too many conclusions,” said Bob Dugan, chief economist with CMHC. “It’s a pretty good first measure, especially because condos are a pretty good way to capture foreign investors. We’re not trying to say it’s an exhaustive measure of foreign activity. It is a data gap and people are concerned about it. So our approach is if we have one of pieces of the puzzle, let’s put it out there.”

CMHC did find there was a larger concentration of foreign ownership in downtown pockets of Canada’s three largest cities. The survey found that downtown Montreal and Nun’s Island had a foreign ownership rate of 6.9% to lead the country. Vancouver’s Burrard Peninsula had 5.8% penetration, while in Toronto’s core it was 4.3%.

The overall numbers were much lower with Toronto leading with 2.4% of all its condominium apartments foreign-owned; Vancouver second at 2.3%; followed by Montreal at 1.5%. Next was Victoria (1.1%), Ottawa (0.7%), Quebec City (0.6%), Saskatoon (0.3%), Calgary (0.2%) and Edmonton, Regina and Winnipeg (each at 0.1%).

To comprise its data, CMHC asked property managers to provide information on the total number of condo apartment units owned by people whose permanent residence is outside of Canada.

Related Tracking foreign buyers in Canada’s housing boom: Can we do it? Should we even care? Subprime lending market in Canada skyrockets to record as banks tighten reins CMHC to hike issuer fees and mortgage rates could follow The move came after the Crown corporation was criticized for conducting a survey of the Toronto and Vancouver condo markets that left out the all-important foreign ownership question. CMHC’s president, Evan Siddall, has committed to erasing some of the “data gaps” relating to ownership by non-residents,

“I think it’s better to say something, if you know something, than nothing at all and wait for the perfect answer,” said Mr. Dugan.

One of the general fears of foreign ownership is that a sudden sell-off of condominiums by non-residents, driven by events outside of Canada, could trigger a collapse in the sector.

Brad Lamb, a developer with projects in Toronto, Edmonton, Calgary and Ottawa, said the numbers produced by CMHC don’t come close to what he sees in his sales office.

“I don’t think the number is accurate and there is no way you can get a true reading on [foreign ownership] unless you mandate everyone to come out and disclose what they own,” said Mr. Lamb. “It’s a silly statistic. What they have produced has zero value.”

Mr. Lamb said the concern is misplaced because the foreigners buying real estate today have their money parked in Canada because they want an investment in a stable climate. He added foreign investment has helped create demand in the condo sector and keep it strong.

There is little doubt that condos, which foreigners have been buying, are a key component of the rental market in Canada. In the markets surveyed by CMHC, rental condo units totalled 216,007 of the total 1,286,148 apartments, with the share is growing.

Benjamin Tal, deputy chief economist with CIBC, said foreign ownership levels in the condo market would probably be higher, depending how the investment is calculated.

“Is it a pure foreign investment? They are talking no connection whatsoever to Canada. No family member here. Nothing,” said Mr. Tal, adding in many cases you have someone living here with the money coming from abroad. “The number is higher, if they include that.”


SEO Powered By SEOPressor