Bruce Coleman Mortgage Brokers

604-688-6002

Five mortgage market truths, like you can do better than 2.99% – Ask a Vancouver Mortgage Broker

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

ROB CARRICK- THE GLOBE AND MAIL

mortgage-ratesHere are five things you need to know about the mortgage market as the spring home-buying season gets going:

1. That 2.99 per cent Bank of Montreal five-year mortgage isn’t quite as good as it sounds.

BMO’s recent move to bring its rate below the psychologically significant 3-per-cent mark for fixed-rate five-year mortgages is being treated as a big deal because a similar move a year ago provoked then-finance minister Jim Flaherty to admonish the bank. Joe Oliver, Mr. Flaherty’s successor, is taking a more laissez-faire attitude.

What BMO is offering until April 17 is a competitive rate in a mortgage with uncompetitive terms. Most importantly, you can’t break this mortgage before it comes up for renewal in five years unless you sell the property, refinance with BMO or do an early renewal into another BMO product. All the usual prepayment penalties would apply in these situations. Veteran mortgage broker Vince Gaetano’s summary: “You’re handcuffed.”

Other issues:

-BMO will hold the rate for 90 days, compared with 120 days at some other lenders.

-You can prepay 10 per cent of the mortgage annually without penalty and increase your payment by 10 per cent a year; 20 per cent is the usual standard for both types of payment increase.

-The skip-a-payment option – a bad idea, admittedly – is not available.

-The maximum amortization period is 25 years; you can typically go up to 30 years if you have a down payment of 20 per cent or more.

2. You can do better than 2.99 per cent.

Mr. Gaetano said late last week that he had a 2.84-per-cent rate on five-year fixed mortgages, but it only applied to clients who had down payments of less than 20 per cent and thus required mortgage default insurance.

The RateSpy.com website confirmed this rate from Mr. Gaetano’s firm, Monster Mortgage, while also showing competing brokers and credit unions with rates in the range of 2.83 per cent to 2.94 per cent. Some other rate comparison sites to try includeRateSupermarket.caRateHub.ca and LowestRates.ca.

3. We will see wide open rate competition this spring.

“I think there will be a full-scale rate war with some mortgage brokers,” said Bruce Joseph, a broker with Anthem Mortgage Group in Barrie, Ont. “We’ve got a huge amount of competition in the market. The market is quite saturated with realtors and brokers.”

Mr. Joseph wonders whether we’ll see more of a practice called “mortgage rate buydowns,” where brokers sacrifice some of their compensation from selling a mortgage in order to get a lower rate for the client. He said some brokerage firms have been aggressive users of buydowns to build sales volume.

Borrowers, there’s nothing to stop you from asking for a rate buydown. You just have to recognize that less compensation for a broker may mean less advice and hand-holding.

4. Variable-rate mortgages are looking good.

Rates on variable-rate mortgages are based on the major banks’ prime lending rate, which has been stuck at 3 per cent since September, 2010, minus a discount. Mr. Gaetano said discounts have widened out to 0.6 percentage points or more from roughly half that level about eight months ago, and that means a variable rate around 2.4 per cent.

His preference for variable-rate mortgages over the fixed-rate alternative right now is based both on the discounts being offered, and his interest rate outlook. “I don’t think rates are going anywhere soon, and getting a variable in the prime minus 0.60 range give you a considerable advantage in hammering down a mortgage.”

That said, many of Mr. Gaetano’s first-time home buyer clients are going with five-year fixed-rate mortgages, which is smart. In today’s expensive housing market, it makes good sense to buy yourself a five-year period to find your financial equilibrium as a homeowner without the risk that your payments will rise.

5. The banks will crush you if you want to break your mortgage.

The penalties that the big banks charge to break a mortgage before it comes up for renewal are abusive. They’re a far more deserving target for the federal finance minister than lenders aggressively undercutting each other on mortgage rates.

Get the lowdown on bank mortgage penalties in this column I wrote not too long ago. If there’s any chance you might have to break your mortgage – brokers say this is by no means unusual – then consider using a non-big bank lender with a lighter touch on penalties. These same lenders are often good on rates, too.

Follow me on Twitter: @rcarrick

——

Why low mortgage rates matter

Even small differences in payments can add up.

Assumptions

-you’re buying a house at the average national price in February of $406,372

-you have a 5 per cent down payment

-CMHC mortgage insurance costs are added to your principal

(table source: RateSpy.com, Canequity.com)

Mortgage Example Bi-weekly accelerated payment Total Payments Over Five Years
Five-Year Fixed
2.84 per cent (best rate found online) $922.41 $119,913
2.99 per cent (BMO’s special offer) $937.60 $121,888
3.39 per cent (another bank’s best special offer) $978.75 $127,237
Variable rate
2.29 per cent (prime minus 0.71; best rate found online) $867.87 $112,823
2.40 per cent (prime minus 0.6; a widely available discount) $878.63 $114,222
2.55 per cent (prime minus 0.45; discounted bank rate) $893.42 $116,145

 

MBRCC’s New Tool for Interprovincial Brokering

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

MBRCC’s New Tool for Interprovincial Brokering

6a00d8341c74cb53ef01a73d980eae970dFor mortgage brokers without face-to-face business models, the Internet makes it easy to close mortgages in another province. And a lot of brokers are doing just that, but not always legally.

That’s partly why the Mortgage Broker Regulator’s Council of Canada (MBRCC) put out this new tool.

They call it the Multijurisdictional Licensing Information Tool. It’s meant to help brokers know when they need to be licensed to work with a borrower in another province. CMT spoke with Martin Boyle, Policy Manager at the MBRCC for more details.

 

Mr. Boyle provided clarification on four broker FAQs (frequently asked questions) surrounding interprovincial brokering:

1. If a broker has an existing client who moves from the province that broker is licensed in to a province that broker is not licensed in, can that broker and client still work together on a mortgage?

Martin: The short answer is yes, the broker can still work with a client who has moved to another province. Brokers are not prohibited from working with clients when they are not in the same province. The question becomes which licensing rules apply when the broker and client are in different provinces. Depending on the province in which the client is now located and the specifics of the mortgage transaction, the mortgage broker may also need to be licensed in that province as well.

The MBRCC Multijurisdictional Licensing Information Tool was design to help brokers by providing guidance on the licence(s) they would likely need if they are working with a client in another province and/or if the property was in another province.

2. If a broker gets a new client from a province that the broker is not registered in, can that broker “co-broker” the mortgage with a 2nd broker who is licensed in that province?

Martin: Each province has its own rules regarding when a licence is required. The rules that apply, and whether or not an additional licence would be required for the 1stbroker in your example, depends on the provinces involved in the transaction. Also, how the 1st broker “gets” the new client could potentially be a factor for consideration (wherever an individual is “holding out” as a broker is considered the location of the broker).

It is recommended that any brokers involved in a transaction as described in [this] question contact the regulatory authority from each province to determine the licensing rules that apply. The following MBRCC webpage includes links to the provincial regulators: Link

3. The licensing tool says the following about an out-of-province broker working with an Alberta client on an Alberta property: “Alberta licensing rules would apply. A “substantial connection test” would need to be conducted by RECA to determine whether you need to be licensed in Alberta for this transaction.” What does that mean exactly?

Martin:  The Real Estate Council of Alberta (RECA) is Alberta’s regulatory authority for mortgage brokering. They have identified a series of factors that they consider when determining whether an Alberta licence is required for transactions with elements outside Alberta’s boundaries. The process for making this determination is called a “substantial connection test.” The following link provides further information on RECA’s substantial connection test: Link

4. Which provinces have reciprocity for mortgage agents? In other words, if you’re licensed in AB, BC, MB, SK, NB, NL, NS, ON or QC, can you apply for an accelerated approval in the other provinces, with no need to take an educational course in that other province?

Martin: Licensing reciprocity arrangements are intended to promote labour mobility by recognizing the occupational standards from other provinces. Reciprocal licensing arrangements apply to those provinces that license individuals (i.e., B.C., Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec). Through these arrangements applicants are eligible for licensing reciprocity without additional educational requirements provided the provinces have occupational equivalents.

Sidebar: Visit this page on MBRCC’s website for reciprocal licensing information from various provinces (For information on the process in Manitoba, please contact the Manitoba Securities Commission directly).

Rob McLister, CMT (email)

Mortgage Freedom on the Horizon for Some Canadians: Scotiabank Study – Ask a Vancouver Mortgage Broker

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

Scotiabank Offers Advice on How to Become Mortgage-Free Faster

mortgage.jpeg.size.xxlarge.promoTORONTO, ON–(Marketwired – April 01, 2014) – The dream of mortgage freedom is less than 10 years away for 37% of Canadian mortgage holders, according to Scotiabank’s Mortgage Landscape Study. More than two-thirds (68%) of mortgage holders have taken steps to pay off their mortgage faster, including increasing the frequency of regular payments (39%), increasing regular payment amounts (25%), and making additional lump sum payments (24%).

Of mortgage holders who agree that being mortgage-free faster is important (80%), the top cited reasons are to have more disposable income (30%), to pay off debt or to pay less interest (both 17%), and to save for retirement (11%).

Additional findings:

  • Just over one-half of mortgage holders (54%) said they are able to make additional mortgage payments, with 34% of those making payments whenever they can afford it, 19% making additional payments annually and 27% semi-annually or more frequent payments.
  • Among the 38% of mortgage holders who say they are not able to make additional payments over and above their regular payments, indicate that affordability (64%) and competing priorities (54%) are key challenges to mortgage freedom.
  • 16% of mortgage holders indicated that they cannot afford any increase in their current payments.

Quote:

“For many, the mortgage is their single biggest debt and it may seem overwhelming,” says David Stafford, Managing Director of Real Estate Secured Lending at Scotiabank. “It’s important for mortgage holders to know that small changes can make a big difference in the total cost of borrowing over the life of the mortgage. While periodic lump sums and even switching to bi-weekly payments are great options, increasing your payments by small amounts, like an extra $20 payment per month, can make a big difference without impacting your lifestyle.”

Four ways to become mortgage-free faster:

In addition to the steps below, current mortgage holders can test the Mortgage-Free Faster Calculator to help identify small changes they can make towards paying off their mortgages faster and build savings for other things like travel, education or retirement.

  1. Switch from monthly to weekly or bi-weekly payments. By increasing the frequency of payments, you will make one extra monthly payment per year, which is directed to reducing the principal balance of your mortgage. The faster you pay off your mortgage, the more money you’ll save in interest costs and you will be mortgage free years ahead of schedule.
  1. Increase your payments. Increasing your mortgage payments by small amounts every year, even by 2%, can help you pay off your mortgage sooner and may have a big impact on what you pay in interest over the long term.
  1. Make lump-sum payments. Take advantage of your pre-payment option and use your tax refund or annual bonus to make lump-sum payments. Choose to pre-pay up to 15% of the original principal amount of your mortgage any time during each year of the term.
  1. Diversify your mortgage by mixing short and long term mortgages and/or fixed and variable rates. Base your total mortgage payment on what it would be based on the highest rate of all the mortgage components. You get the advantage of lower interest rates on some portion of your mortgage, while paying it off sooner at the same time.

About the polling data
For this survey, TNS Canada conducted online interviews among 500 mortgage holders and 260 mortgage intenders aged 21 years or older. Mortgage holders were defined as property owners with a mortgage (either on primary or secondary residence or income property), who are not intending to get a new mortgage in next 12 months. Mortgage intenders were defined as consumers in the market for a mortgage in the next 12 months. In tabulation, data was weighted to be reflective of the distribution of mortgage holders and intenders by region, gender, and age, using a combination of results from Statistics Canada and from the 2012 Scotiabank ‘Mega Poll’. The survey was conducted between December 19 and 30, 2013.

About Scotiabank 
Scotiabank is a leading financial services provider in over 55 countries and Canada’s most international bank. Through our team of more than 83,000 employees, Scotiabank and its affiliates offer a broad range of products and services, including personal and commercial banking, wealth management, corporate and investment banking to over 21 million customers. With assets of $783 billion (as at January 31, 2014), Scotiabank trades on the Toronto (TSXBNS) and New York Exchanges (NYSE: BNS). Scotiabank distributes the Bank’s media releases using Marketwired. For more information please visit www.scotiabank.com.

BACKGROUND

REGIONAL BREAKOUTS

Time Horizon to be Mortgage Free

Total Atlantic Quebec Ontario West
Less than 1 year 2% 1% 1% 3% 2%
1 to 3 years 6% 2% 5% 6% 6%
4 to 5 years 7% 6% 7% 5% 9%
6 to 10 years 22% 32% 21% 22% 19%
11 to 20 years 39% 33% 41% 42% 36%
21 years or more 24% 26% 25% 21% 28%

Top reasons to be mortgage free faster

Total Atlantic Quebec Ontario West
Have more disposable income 30% 34% 24% 33% 31%
To get rid of debt/debt free 17% 9% 22% 13% 19%
Can pay less/low interest 17% 7% 33% 9% 19%
Able to save for retirement 11% 22% 2% 13% 12%
Save money/more money 10% 3% 7% 14% 9%

Ability to make additional mortgage payments

Total Atlantic Quebec Ontario West
Yes 54% 53% 57% 54% 52%
No 38% 39% 31% 39% 40%
Don’t know 8% 9% 11% 7% 8%

Steps taken to pay off mortgage sooner
(in additional to regular payments)

Total Atlantic Quebec Ontario West
Increased frequency of regular payments 39% 43% 44% 36% 37%
Increased amount of regular payments 25% 13% 26% 27% 24%
Made additional lump sum payment(s) 24% 25% 18% 23% 30%
Renegotiated for a lower mortgage rate 19% 12% 16% 21% 20%
Other 2% 4% 2%
None of the above 32% 39% 23% 34% 36%

Reasons for not making additional mortgage payments

Total Atlantic Quebec Ontario West
Do not have enough money to do so 64% 42% 50% 72% 67%
Have other debts to pay off first 42% 46% 27% 40% 50%
Need the money for other priorities 27% 23% 43% 21% 27%
Current payment is manageable 18% 13% 39% 18% 9%
Haven’t had the mortgage very long 16% 10% 29% 7% 21%
Never thought about it before 6% 22% 8% 4% 4%

Ed Clark ‘supportive’ of Finance Minister Joe Oliver’s hands-off approach in mortgage wars

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

Copyright - THE CANADIAN PRESS/Larry MacDougal; Arlen Redekop/Postmedia News
Image Copyright- THE CANADIAN PRESS/Larry MacDougal; Arlen Redekop/Postmedia News
Toronto-Dominion Bank chief executive Ed Clark is throwing his support behind Finance Minister Joe Oliver’s decision not tell banks how to price their mortgages.

Top economist calls out Ottawa on ‘unhealthy’ lack of information about housing market

Crucial information needed to assess the health of our housing market is not available in Canada, and without it, players are flying blind, says CIBC economist

Dictating to lenders what to charge for home loans is “treacherous territory,” Mr. Clark told reporters on Thursday, following TD’s annual meeting in Calgary.

Mr. Clark said he is “supportive of” Mr. Oliver’s strategy — disclosed in comments to reporters last week — of letting the banks make their own decisions on how much to charge customers.

Economists and policymakers have been warning for the last several years about soaring household debt in Canada, especially when it comes to mortgages, by far the biggest chunk of that debt.

If the government is worried, “there are other ways” than dictating mortgage rates,  Mr. Clark said, referring to rule changes around things like the availability of Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. default insurance and the kinds of loans that qualify for it.

“I think the focus has to be, are there other macro-prudencial things that you could do?” he said. “You know, [the government] changed the amortization rate, there’s lots of rules you could do that would slow down, take the pressure off the housing market but don’t change the price. I just think you come to the conclusion that governments fixing [mortgage rates] hasn’t been a success.”

This latest flare-up of the mortgage wars kicked off after Bank of Montreal announced late last month it was cutting its five-year mortgage rate to 2.99%, despite being reprimanded by then Finance Minister Jim Flaherty when it tried the same tactic last year.

Critics worry that the high personal debt levels have left the economy vulnerable and argue banks are partly to blame. For their part, the banks insist they are lending money only to customers who can afford to pay it back. And if they’re offering good rates, that’s because their own cost of funding is low as well.

There’s “healthy competition” among Canadian banks, Mr. Clark said. “You got a competitive industry so no one’s going to not match the other guy’s prices.”

Asked if he was concerned about the financial health of consumers, Bank of Montreal chief executive Bill Downe said earlier this week that his customers can meet their obligations. BMO is lowering its risk by focusing on “shorter amortizations,” in other words, loans that get paid down faster.

“I think the trick is to make sure that the underwriting standards are sufficiently conservative that the borrowers can pay the money back, and that’s really the issue,” he added.

Industry executives reject comparisons between Canada and the U.S. real estate meltdown that began in 2006, noting that standards in this country are much higher than they were south of the border, where players doled out tens of billions to people who were unable to make their payments when their mortgage rates jumped a few years later.

What happened in the U.S. was “colossal stupidity, but the regulator said it was okay,” so lenders just kept on lending, Mr. Clark said. In Canada, by contrast, there’s a different regulatory culture that focuses on principles rather than just meeting the requirements of complex rules.

The comments come the same day as Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce economistBenjamin Tal warned there is a “mind-boggling” gap between the size and importance of Canada’s real estate market and the amount of good information about it.

Mr. Tal said in a report called “Flying Blind” that the lack of public data makes it difficult to judge whether Canada is experiencing a housing bubble.

A key unknown is the proportion of foreign buyers. Banks may know how many of their customers are from abroad, but they’re reluctant to share the information for competitive reasons.

Other missing data points include the distribution of home loans by credit score and the value of new mortgages in the most recent three-month period.

Leaving the city (and the big mortgage) behind – Ask a Vancouver Mortgage Broker

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

Vancouver Mortgage Broker

Many couples, stunned by the value of their homes in Canadian urban centers like Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver, are pondering trading city life for opportunities to cut costs in the suburbs or beyond.

Slightly more than three years ago, I sat down with my wife after a lousy commute and discussed why we were still in Toronto.

Sure, she had a good job in the city, but I was freelance, and with two young children in elementary school, we pondered whether there were other options.

The positives were clear — if we left the city it would change our financial position dramatically. We could trade our Scarborough rebuild in an up-and-coming part of the city for a house in the best area of a city like London, Ont., where we both went to school.

And the best part? We could buy that house in London, with more room in a better area for about 60% of the value of our Scarborough home, which saw its price skyrocket in the seven years we owned it.

It wasn’t that tough a decision; in 2012 we sold our house, packed a moving truck and rolled down the 401 to London.

It is a scenario that is becoming increasingly common — couples, stunned by the value of their homes in Canadian urban centers like Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver, are pondering trading city life for opportunities to cut costs in the suburbs or beyond.

Freelance writer Peter Robinson and his wife Jody, an elementary teacher, faced this scenario in 2010. The couple, who owned a small house on Toronto’s west side, started considering how they’d move forward. With an expanding family, a bigger house was a necessity. But the price of a larger home was daunting and they started considering their options.

“I could work from anywhere and Jody was willing to make a commute to her school in Brampton,” says Mr. Robinson. “She decided she’d bite the bullet and spend an extra five hours a week commuting if we moved.”

Robinson says the couple wasn’t enjoying the benefits of Toronto in the way they were prior to having children, a common theme among young families considering a move from the city.

“Some people leave the city because they hate it,” says Mr. Robinson. “That wasn’t our case, though the traffic is always bad.”

The couple listed their 1,300 square foot home for $500,000, up $140,000 from when they purchased it a few years previous, and started looking in Barrie, about an hour’s drive north of Toronto. They were able to buy a house in Barrie for $385,000 and double their square footage within walking distance to a nearby school.

“We moved to the quintessential upper middle-class neighborhood,” says Mr. Robinson, who grew up in Barrie. “It takes a mental leap to move if you grew up here. But people in the city don’t realize how good life can be in the suburbs.”

Many moves are driven by the equity couples have in their homes. Anne Carbert, a career counselor, moved to Toronto in 1996. Ms. Carbert, along with her partner, Don, a radio broadcaster and writer, started considering leaving their Riverdale home largely based on the appreciation of its value.

“The goal was ‘let’s get out from under the city mortgage when we have the opportunity,’” she says. The couple moved to Stratford, Ont., and are currently renting while they consider real estate opportunities.

One thing is clear, they expect to be able to find exactly what they want for less than half the price of their $800,000 Toronto home.

Ryan Tracy, who taught at Durham College while living in Whitby, saw real estate prices as an opportunity to make a change in his career. Along with his wife and two small children, Mr. Tracy, 31, decided to pursue a job in Miramichi, N.B., as the general manager of a semi-private golf club.

“We were really sick of the rat race,” says Mr. Tracy, whose wife, Amanda-Lee Cassidy, has a job with Scotiabank. “We wanted to follow the opportunity and the notion of having a house outside of a city really appealed to us.”

The couple has been searching for property near Miramichi, a location in stark contrast to their current situation in the Toronto suburb of Whitby, where they have a 1,800 square foot home on a small lot.

“We can use our house as an asset, which you can’t always say,” says Mr. Tracy. “The notion of selling our home and buying a home and having no mortgage, that’s quite something. They say the majority of people in the city will still have a mortgage well past 60.”

Mr. Tracy and his family will spend some time in housing supplied by his workplace while they look to purchase their home.
“It is such a big difference than living in the GTA,” he says. “Most lots [in Miramichi] are an acre and you can get them for $200,000.”

Like many who have made the move out of one of Canada’s big cities, I don’t regret it. Yes, property taxes are higher here, something that shocks my Toronto friends. And I certainly make the drive into the city more frequently than I’d like, though I can try to find off-peak times to battle traffic.

But we also traded up in many ways, moving from a mid-price area of old Scarborough, full of post-WWII bungalows, to a cul-de-sac near a private golf course.

And many young families who leave large urban areas find cost savings in areas like daycare, which, for two children, cost more than our mortgage when we were in Toronto.

The biggest concern many have when leaving is how they’d ever afford to return if work necessitated it.

“I don’t know how we’d do it,” says Mr. Robinson.

Neither do I. And thankfully, for the foreseeable future at least, it isn’t something I need to consider.

More self-employed hitting mortgage wall because of recent rule changes – Ask a Vancouver Mortgage Broker

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

78631848For years, most of Marg Green’s self-employed clients could count on getting a mortgage on the strength of their credit score, and on their word that they were earning enough from their business to repay the loan.

These days, because of rules brought in almost two years ago by the regulator of the country’s chartered banks, borrowing money to buy a home has become harder for many of the country’s 2.75 million self-employed workers – a group that, according to Statistics Canada, has a higher median net worth than paid employees.

“We went through years and years when my clients who were self-employed could get a mortgage if their credit score was 680 or higher, with next to no documentation,” says Ms. Green, director and broker at Concierge Mortgage Group, based in Mississauga. “Today I’ve got clients going in to their bank for mortgage refinancing and they’re shocked because suddenly they’re no longer approvable.”

In the summer of 2012, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions introduced Guideline B-20, which required federally regulated banks to tighten their processes for approving mortgages and home equity lines of credit. As part of B-20, banks must now look more closely at incomes before approving a mortgage application.

This presents a problem for self-employed workers, who typically lower their taxable income by maximizing business expenses and personal deductions. Because of the discrepancy between what’s on their tax return and how much money they actually earn, self-employed workers have typically obtained their mortgage through “stated income” applications, which required a signed income declaration and proof of self-employment such as a business registration number or articles of incorporation.

Today, self-employed workers can still apply for a stated income mortgage at some banks, but under B-20 they can borrow only 65 per cent of the purchase value – 10 per cent less than what was allowed before B-20 – without requiring default insurance from Canada Mortgage Housing Corp., Genworth Canada or Canada Guaranty.

“If you have less than 35-per-cent down payment, your mortgage now has to be insured, and insurers have specific guidelines that you need to meet,” says Ms. Green. “For example, CMHC will allow a stated income application as long as you have been self-employed for less than three years. More than three years and you have to qualify according to your net taxable income.”

So what can self-employed workers do to improve their chances of qualifying for the mortgage they need, on terms that work for them?

Jeff Brown, vice-president for delivery initiatives and business integration at Toronto-based Meridian Credit Union, says coming in with complete and current financial and tax documents is critical. Meridian usually asks for the latest notice of assessment from Canada Revenue Agency and financial statements from the past two years.

“We may also ask to see bank statements to show regular income going into your bank account,” says Mr. Brown.

Raza Hasan, senior vice-president for retail lending and wealth-management risk management at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, says self-employed borrowers need to make sure they are up-to-date with income and sales tax returns, and that they don’t owe taxes.

They also need to be ready to explain their business.

“It’s very important that you be able to discuss the details of your business – your income, expenses, at what point in time you will break even, your business milestones,” Mr. Hasan says. “Then we can look at that and find the right solution for you.”

The more information a bank has, the better it can help self-employed borrowers qualify for the mortgage they want, says Ms. Green, whose client base is made up largely of self-employed workers.

“Certain lenders allow add backs of things like car expenses, capital cost allowance or housing expenses,” Ms. Green says. “These add backs then enable the applicant to qualify for what they want to buy.”

Some lenders take a different approach to increase the mortgage eligibility of self-employed workers. Vancity Credit Union in Vancouver, for one, adds 15 per cent to reported income and will boost the percentage if the self-employed borrower provides financial statements showing deducted business expenses totalled more than 15 per cent.

Ms. Green notes that credit unions are not affected by B-20 and many still extend a mortgage of up to 80 per cent of purchase value to stated-income applicants without the need for default insurance.

For sole proprietors or owners of an unincorporated business, making the leap to incorporation could also help, says Jeff Hull, senior financial adviser at Manulife Securities Inc.

“Most banks prefer salary, and if you have a corporation you can pay yourself a salary,” he says. “That may make it easier for a self-employed individual to qualify for a mortgage.”

Incorporating could also reduce tax rates and allow the business owner to collect a higher salary or dividend payout, Mr. Hull adds.

What bubble? Canadians have their mortgage covered, study shows – Consult with a Vancouver Mortgage Broker

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

A new Conference Board of Canada study says there’s no housing bubble about to burst and maintains Canadian are having no trouble handling their debt even as it sits close to record levels.

housing-market‘Every man for himself’: Homebuyers’ top 5 bidding war stories

One in three Canadians are willing to enter into a bidding war and a third of first-time home buyers will break their budgets for the right home. But people need to be careful not to get too emotional

Continue reading

The Ottawa-based group points out that mortgage arrears are actually going down in just about every market across the country — making a U.S.-style meltdown unlikely. The percentage of mortgages in arrears is well under 1% in Canada.

“A relatively low proportion of arrears is likely to persist, since national employment is growing, albeit slowly, and interest rates are not forecast to spike,” says the Conference Board in its report titled Bubble Fears Overblown.

The report says the market will cool but it will happen “gently” and cites mortgage costs, not just home prices, as the principal determining factor for the market for future buyers.

“We believe that the more prudent mortgage underwriting in Canada than in the United States, headlined by the very small number of subprime loans here, has prevented the stockpiling of high-risk mortgages by lenders,” states the report.

Others argue the Canadian market bears striking similarity to the U.S. market.

“It’s a lagging indicator,” says David Madani, an economist with Capital Economics, about mortgage arrears. He says the arrears come when the market starts to fail. “The first sign of trouble in the U.S. was declining home sales, then a year later prices fell and then people started missing payments.”

Much has been made of Canada’s tighter loan standards with none of the NINJA loans — no income, no job, no appraisal — that were found in the U.S.

Still, Canadians are holding onto records amount of debt. Statistics Canada said debt to disposal income went down slightly during the fourth quarter of 2013 but at 164% it remains very close to an all-time high.

“It’s an extraordinary level next to household income and interest rates don’t have to spike,” said Mr. Madani. “Even if they go up moderately, it can have big impact on affordability.”

With little demand from new buyers, prices would ultimately sink and leave people vulnerable as they try to renew mortgages.

The Conference Board notes that many U.S. states have non-recourse home loans, meaning banks cannot go after other assets from consumers who walk away from homes. That protection doesn’t exist in most Canadian markets.

Mr. Madani said that would be a non-factor for recent buyers who have few other assets and no reason to stay with a mortgage that is under water. “That’s what is called a strategic default,” says the economist, noting many consumers in that scenario would be willing to face the credit challenges that come post-bankruptcy if their home price collapses.

Vince Gaetano, a mortgage broker with monstermortgage.ca, says all the mortgage rule changes that have come from Ottawa for anyone buying a home with mortgage default insurance have made it tougher to buy in this market.

“There are not as many straight forward mortgage approvals,” says Mr. Gaetano, adding he can’t see arrears reaching U.S. levels because “we never had NINJA loans.”

Still, the tougher mortgage rules, which have included shrinking amortization lengths from as long as 40 years down to a maximum of 25 years, have had an impact on the consumer.

Benjamin Tal, deputy chief economist with Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, said all the mortgage changes amount to a 125 basis point increase in rates for first-time buyers. A shorter amortization payment means a higher monthly payment while decreasing size of a loan for consumers.

“The market will slow, the only question is how quickly,” says Mr. Tal, who expects prices to fall nationally 10% to 15%. But in his view that’s not a bubble bursting. “The debate about overshooting is over, the question is the magnitude. At 10% to 15% that’s a market finding its footing.”


SEO Powered By SEOPressor