Bruce Coleman Mortgage Brokers

604-688-6002

Meet the interest rate that really affects your life – Consult with Bruce Coleman, Vancouver Mortgage Broker

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

BRYAN BORZYKOWSKI – Special to The Globe and Mail

Vancouver Mortgage Broker

Alex Thomas, a Toronto public relations professional, was smart to have locked in a 3.39-per-cent mortgage interest rate in July. Rates have increased since then. ‘By the time we got our mortgage, the rate had already gone up twice.’
(J.P. MOCZULSKI FOR THE GLOBE AND MAIL)

Alex Thomas couldn’t have chosen a better time to lock into a five-year, fixed-rate mortgage. The Toronto-based public relations professional locked in a 3.39-per-cent rate for 120 days at the beginning of July. He bought a house in October, but if he had waited any longer, his monthly payments would likely have gone up.

Why? Because Canada’s long-term interest rates have been steadily climbing since June. When Mr. Thomas locked in, the 10-year Government of Canada Benchmark Bond – the rate that’s most closely tied to mortgage rates – was about 2.4 per cent. It has steadily been rising since then, hovering around 2.6 per cent.

“I’m glad we got preapproved,” he says. “By the time we got our mortgage, the rate had already gone up twice.”

When it comes to interest rates, most of the attention is on the Bank of Canada’s overnight rate, which governs short-term lending. But it’s long-term fixed income rates that have the most affect on people’s wealth. Rising five-year, 10-year and 30-year yields impact everything from mortgage rates to portfolio returns.

Unlike the overnight rate, which the Bank of Canada is responsible for moving, the long-term rates shift based on what’s happening around the world.

For most of last year and until late May, the 10-year Government of Canada bond rate was in the 1.6 per cent to 2 per cent range. Then, U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke said that he might slow down the U.S. government’s quantitative easing program – it’s been buying $85-billion (U.S.) worth of its own bonds since last fall.

That announcement caused long-term bond rates to rise around the world.

“The Bank of Canada had nothing to do with that,” says Darcy Briggs, a portfolio manager with Franklin Templeton Investments. “These rates are greatly affected by events occurring outside of the bank’s control.”

For house hunters like Mr. Thomas, the most obvious impact of rising rates is higher fixed-mortgage costs, says Mr. Briggs. According to Ratehub.ca, in May Canadians could get a five-year fixed rate for 2.64 per cent. That rate is now closer to 3.4 per cent.

Variable mortgage rates are based on the overnight rate, explains Mr. Briggs, so those costs haven’t increased this year.

Rising rates have also had an impact on certain investments, but especially on bond values, says Allan Small, a senior investment adviser at HollisWealth. When yields rise, bond prices fall, he explains.

“If a bond issue today is paying 6 per cent and an old bond is paying 5 per cent, then who would want the bond that’s paying less?” he asks. “That lower-paying bond then gets sold at a discounted price.”

In June of 2012, the Government of Canada issued a 10-year bond for about $100. Because rates have risen, that bond is now worth about $90.

“People in retirement have flocked to bonds because they’re low-risk investments,” Mr. Small says. “But over the last couple of months, they see their portfolio down, even though the stock market is going up, and they’re wondering what’s going on.”

However, it’s not just falling bond prices that have affected wealth. Certain equities are affected by higher rates, too. Investors who hold real estate investment trusts and utilities will have noticed that returns have fallen.

These two sectors typically offer higher-than-average yields, which is attractive in a low interest-rate environment. When bond rates rise, though, the risk and return properties of these stocks become less attractive. It starts making more sense to own a more stable fixed-income instrument than an equity investment, Mr. Briggs says.

“At 1 per cent, that bond doesn’t look as attractive, but it gets better at 2 per cent,” he explains. “That makes the outlook for other investments not as bright.”

This doesn’t matter as much to investors who are solely in the market for income, says Mr. Small. Hold a bond to maturity and you’ll still get the same return as you would have when you originally purchased it.

If you want to sell a stock or bond, or want to see your portfolio rise, then you may be out of luck.

“If you’re concerned about the value of your portfolio, then you have to be mindful of the risk.”

To minimize the impact of rising rates, Mr. Small avoids bond funds, which don’t have a maturity date and often fall when rates rise. He buys the actual bond for clients because he’s able to hold the security to maturity and receive the full payout he was entitled to when he purchased the bond.

“I know at some point in the future, it will reach its maturity date, so I don’t care about the price,” he says.

Some investors may also want to pare back their exposure to real estate investment trusts, utilities and other interest-rate-sensitive stocks, Mr. Small says. If rates continue to rise, then these stocks could be hit again.

Instead, consider owning some bank stocks. Financial institutions also pay attractive yields, but they benefit from rising rates – higher rates allow them to make more off the dollars held in savings accounts.

For Mr. Thomas, the only affect rising rates would have had on him would have been on his mortgage. He doesn’t yet invest, but he’s planning to start. When he does, he says he will keep his eye on where rates are headed.

“I’m reading about what’s going on with rates,” he says. “That could impact where I put my money.”

Canadian homes slip in affordability – Ask Bruce Coleman, Vancouver Mortgage Broker

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

TARA PERKINS REAL ESTATE REPORTER — The Globe and Mail

Vancouver Mortgage BrokerHigher mortgage rates and house prices have eroded the affordability of Canadian homes for the second quarter in a row.

But the impact was largely confined to the markets for detached bungalows and single-family homes, which are becoming more of an unaffordable luxury in many parts of Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver, Royal Bank of Canada’s economics department suggests in a report to be released Wednesday.

Condos, on the other hand, saw only a small deterioration in affordability, as an abundance of new supply is keeping prices in check.

The difference between ownership costs for single-family houses and condos hit near-record levels, with the measures of affordability for the two types of dwellings registering the second-widest gap since the mid-1980s during the third quarter of this year, according to RBC chief economist Craig Wright.

The divergence speaks to the degree to which rising house prices, as opposed to other factors including rising mortgage rates, are having an impact on affordability.

RBC’s housing affordability measure, which looks at what proportion of a typical household’s monthly pre-tax income must go to the cost of owning a home, rose 0.7 percentage points to 43.3 per cent for detached bungalows; 0.6 percentage points to 48.9 per cent for two-storey houses; and only 0.1 percentage points, to 28 per cent, for condominiums.

“Even though affordability of all housing categories remains within manageable levels overall in Canada, single-family homes represent more of a stretch for home buyers than they have historically, whereas condo apartment affordability is closer to its historical norm,” the report states.

“By the third quarter, stronger resale activity across Canada heated up home prices a few degrees, though primarily in single-family home categories,” Mr. Wright said. “At the same time, Canadian bond yields rose in tandem with those in the U.S., climbing in anticipation of the Fed tapering its bond-buying program. These factors translated into the first notable increase in mortgage rates in Canada this summer since the second quarter of 2011 and, ultimately, contributed to a slip in affordability.”

Mortgage rates have risen by more than three-quarters of a percentage point since May.

The increases in home prices and mortgage rates overshadowed income gains, but “the lessening of affordability that resulted from this combination of factors was mild overall and did not pose any immediate threat to the general health of the housing market,” the report said.

RBC economist Robert Hogue said he expects house prices to be flat next year, although they might maintain their upward trajectory during the first half of 2014 before weakness sets in. The near-term strength comes as demand for homes has slightly outpaced the degree to which sellers are putting up new listings.

But he expects that bond yields will drift upward over the course of the next year, contributing to a further slight increase in mortgage rates.

“Across the country, housing affordability continues to be the poorest, by far, in the Vancouver area, where the latest RBC measures are significantly above their long-term average,” the report said. “At the other end of the spectrum, affordability in Alberta and the Atlantic region still looked reasonably attractive for the most part in the third quarter.”

Ottawa to introduce ‘risk fee’ on CMHC insurance – Consult with Bruce Coleman, Vancouver Mortgage Broker

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

Canada will impose a “risk fee” starting Jan. 1 on mortgage insurance provided by the country’s housing agency to compensate taxpayers for potential losses in the housing market.

Vancouver Mortgage BrokerCanada Mortgage & Housing Corp. said the fee to the government will be “3.25% of premiums written and 10 basis points on new portfolio insurance written,” according to a financial report today for the three months ended Sept. 30.

“We certainly don’t expect it to have any impact on the availability or cost of mortgage funding,” CMHC chief financial officer Brian Naish said on a conference call with reporters today. “We don’t see it as a material event.”

The fee is the latest attempt by Finance Minister Jim Flaherty to rein in the agency amid concerns the nation’s housing market may be overvalued. The government-owned agency insures mortgages against default, and its insurance is fully backed by the federal government. By law, Canadian mortgages that have less than a 20% downpayment must be insured.

Private-sector mortgage insurers already pay a levy of 2.25% on their premiums, said Stephanie Rubec, a spokeswoman for the federal finance department. The government set the CMHC fee higher, at 3.25%, because it guarantees 100% of CMHC insurance, compared with only 90% backing for private insurers, she said.Advertisement

Risk Compensation

“The fees compensate the government for risks stemming from its guarantee of mortgage insurance,” she said in an e- mail. “This measure supports the government’s continuous efforts to reinforce the housing finance framework.”

The move may raise mortgage rates by as many as 10 basis points, or 0.10 percentage points, an increase that probably won’t have a major impact on housing demand, said National Bank Financial analyst Peter Routledge.

“What the government’s trying to do is really lean into the interest-rate wind and, in a very targeted way, keep the cost of borrowing” for households steady, he said by phone from Toronto. “They’re trying to tighten the interest-rate environment in one very targeted segment of the economy.”

Portfolio insurance refers to coverage on mortgages with a downpayment greater than 20%. Financial institutions often buy such insurance in bulk so they can repackage home loans as securities for investors.

Under a law governing the agency, the government has the authority to impose fees to “compensate for exposure,” Naish said, adding the fee will result in an annual payment to the government of about $50-million per year.

The agency is reviewing the impact of the fee on the portfolio insurance it offers to lenders, he said.

CMHC had $560-billion in outstanding mortgage insurance at the end of September, down 6.3% from the end of last year, it said today in its quarterly report.

www.bloomberg.com

Flaherty charges CMHC new risk fee on mortgages – Consult with Bruce Coleman, Vancouver Mortgage Broker

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty is taking another step to curb taxpayers’ exposure to the housing market, by charging Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. a new risk fee.

Vancouver Mortgage BrokerAs of Jan. 1, the Crown corporation will have to pay the government a fee equivalent to 3.25 per cent of the mortgage insurance premiums it writes and 10 basis points on portfolio insurance it writes.

The fee is part of Mr. Flaherty’s continuing efforts to rein in CMHC’s activities and limit the risk for taxpayers. Earlier this week the International Monetary Fund said the Canadian government should do more to reduce its role in the mortgage insurance system and transfer risk to the private sector.

Steps that Mr. Flaherty has already taken in recent years range from tightening the rules that govern which mortgages are eligible for insurance, to capping the amount of insurance that CMHC can have outstanding at $600-billion, and restricting the ability of banks to buy portfolio insurance to reduce their capital requirements.

Mortgage insurance is mandatory in Canada when the borrower has a down payment of less than 20 per cent. It reimburses the bank if the borrower defaults on their mortgage. Portfolio or bulk insurance is something that banks can buy to cover large portfolios of previously uninsured mortgages.

CMHC estimates that the risk fee will result in a payment to the government of about $50-million next year, based on its projected insurance volumes, but that the hit to the Crown corporation’s earnings will be less than that because the fee will be amortized.

“We certainly don’t anticipate it to have any impact on the availability or cost of mortgage funding, so we don’t see it as a material event,” CMHC chief financial officer Brian Naish told reporters on a conference call Friday, adding that it will have a “very minimal impact on our bottom line.”

CMHC said it earned $452-million in the third quarter, up 20 per cent from a year ago, thanks largely to a reduction in net claims. The total amount of insurance in force fell to $559.8-billion, compared with $566.1-billion at the end of 2012.

Royal Bank of Canada analyst Geoffrey Kwan said that CMHC’s two private-sector rivals, Genworth MI Canada Inc. and Canada Guaranty, already have to pay a risk fee to the government of 2.25 per cent of premiums written.

The fact that CMHC’s new risk fee is higher than that likely reflects the fact that Ottawa provides more backstop to the Crown corporation, he added. The government guarantees 100 per cent of CMHC’s business, but only 90 per cent of its private-sector competitors.

Home Series: Don’t Neglect Your Vancouver Roof – Consult with Bruce Coleman, Vancouver Mortgage Broker

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

Don’t Neglect Your Vancouver Roof

6107925A roof is one of the areas that many home owners and prospective home buyers often neglect. As a buyer, you might ask some vague questions about it when buying  a home, and leave it up to the home inspector to provide you with an assessment. Or, as a homeowner, you might not bother with it too much until it’s too late.

Roofs come in many different building materials and are constantly subject to the wear and tear of the elements. All roofing materials used have a shelf life, but generally this is only for around 10 to 15 years. Even the sturdier metal roofs should not be overlooked and should be regularly inspected.

The roof is the primary cap on your home. Once you start to see or notice a leak or problem, it might be far worse than you think. Water may be seeping behind the drywall and getting absorbed into the insulation which can often happen with a slow leak. The result could be that the insulation could be starting to rot and mould can quietly grow and spread.

Leaks can be a challenge to locate because water can find some weird paths as water simply follows the path of least resistance. You might think your leak is right above you when it fact the actual area of the roof which has been compromised is actually at the opposite end of the structure.

You really should inspect your roof at least once a year. Looking at it from the yard isn’t necessarily going to reveal too much. If you know how to safely set up a ladder and have some idea of what to look for when examining a roof, that would be very helpful in identifying problems before they occur.

One thing you should always do in both spring and fall is to ensure that your gutters are free of leaves and check to see that water will flow down the troughs. This is especially important before winter comes because you don’t want water backing up under the roof and freezing, because this will cause expansion and gradual damage.

Other things to look for when checking the roof include the following:

  • Check for missing shingles
  • Check for shingles which are curling at the edges, have blisters or cracks or appear excessively weathered such as signs of extreme fading
  • Check the attic, if you have one, with a good flashlight and this means the entire crawlspace if handy to look for water stains, mould or a mildew smell
  • Check your ceiling and look for signs of water staining
  • Check the metal flashing for signs of rust
  • Check the shingles for signs of moss or algae
  • Check for  roof sag and examine all roof ridges
  • Check flat areas of the roof and look for water pooling

Should you spot any of these signs then you need to take immediate action because the worst thing you can do is to allow the condition to do nothing. The longer you let it go, the more damage you are going to have in the interior of your home.

Some roofing problems might only require some quality patchwork. If you have the skills then you could do it yourself. If not, then you will need as experienced contractor to perform the repairs or replacement for you.

When hiring a roofer, make sure you have checked them out and don’t settle on using just any roofing contractor that you pick from the yellow pages. Ask for references and make sure you call those references.

What Does a Vancouver Real Estate Lawyer Do? – Ask Bruce Coleman Vancouver Mortgage Broker

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

What Does a Vancouver Real Estate Lawyer Do?

What Does a Vancouver Real Estate Lawyer Do?It’s a common practice and a wise move that any Vancouver home buyer uses the service of a Vancouver real restate lawyer when buying a house or condo. Given the average price of both types of properties this city, this is a major investment and the last thing you want to happen is get hit with an unexpected expensive or nasty surprise such an easement issue or outstanding property taxes.

Most people usually don’t involve a real estate lawyer until the transaction is about to be completed and after we have signed the purchase agreement. At that point, all we expect the lawyer to do is to perform a title search, register the deed and arrange to complete the money transfer.

However, some real estate experts suggest that it might even more prudent to bring a real estate lawyer earlier into the process to review the purchase agreement beforehand. Although we like to think that everything is going to be on the up-and-up, this is not always the case.

One example where the term “easement” is used instead of the word “encroachment” which can make a big difference when it comes property title insurance and additional legal costs.

When buying a condo, many developers have “special” incentives to entice a buyer into buying. You could be dealing with a condo agreement that can have up to 50 pages of legalise which might appear straightforward but can mean all whole different thing wrought with expensive surprises such as unexpected condo fees after you have already completed the deal and moved into the condo.

An area where getting a lawyer involved early in the process can be save you money is involves the financing of a property. A simple turn of the phrase such as the deal being “conditional on financing” is actually quite different to having it read as “conditional based obtaining the financing that the buyer actually wants.”

That’s the problem with contracts. The complexities of legalise means a contract can phrase things in a variety of subtle ways that can end up causing you grief and hefty out- of- pocket expenses down the road.

As buyers we expect that things will be fully explained to us and that any fine print will also be covered in the explanation, but this not always the case. Whether you read the contract, purchase agreement, financing documents in full or not yourself, the simple truth is that if you’re not a real estate lawyer, you could easily overlook something vital when reading through the paperwork.

A new home or condo buyer might also not realize that these additional fees can be added onto the purchase price such as installing your meters for hydro and water, landscaping, structural defects, charges for development and other expensive costs for example.

Finally, whatever you do, make sure you can an experienced real estate lawyer and this means one who specializes in real estate and not just occasionally dabbles in it as part of their overall legal practice. Do some research and check them out with the bar association.

You should also get a written quote and ask whether that includes all costs and expenses, and make sure that they will be accessible when you need to either talk to them or meet with them

 

How Do Vancouver Property Disclosures Work? – Ask Bruce Coleman, Vancouver Mortgage Broker

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

How Do Vancouver Property Disclosures Work?

West-Coast-House-by-PnwraEvery home or condo has its own distinct traits. Some home owners spend a lot of time in keeping up on their home maintenance with an attention to detail. Other home owners aren’t so fussy and let home maintenance slide. As a prospective home buyer, you don’t always get the full picture of what you might be buying.

Even though it is a requirement in B.C. that a home seller is required to disclose vital information about defects in their home such as leaks, mould, major repairs, foundation, and other issues, to their own realtor, or to you and your realtor, not everybody is as forthcoming and truthful as we would like to think.

Another problem that can happen is that even though the seller is being truthful about what they disclose, potential problems might exist which they are not even aware about.

In B.C. there is a quasi regulation that exists which does require that any maintenance or repair issues should be disclosed to all prospective home buyers. And, don’t forget that when you go to sell a home, these regulations also apply to you as well.

The biggest thing to remember is that any disclosure you receive should only be one part of the process because there is more you have to do to protect your interests.

B.C. Disclosure Laws Explained

First, you should know that the regulations that have put into pace will only provide you with limited protection. It always boils down to “caveat emptor” which means “buyer beware.”

The disclosure regulations is called the PDS which is an acronym for “Property Disclosure Statement” and was first introduced in 1991 through the efforts of the B.C. Real Estate Association. For condominiums it is also known as SPDS which means “Strata Property Disclosure Statement”, and for rural properties it is referred to as the RPDS or “Rural Property Disclosure Statement.”

In 2004, the B.C. Real Estate Association did amend the statement to specifically ask whether the home has been ever used as a marijuana grow-op or as an illegal drug lab.

How Useful is a Property Disclosure Statement?

The first thing to know is that a PDS is neither obligatory nor is it necessarily legally enforceable. The form is simply given to the seller to complete by their realtor. If the seller isn’t willing to complete one, then any prospective buyer might be wise to consider its absence as a “red flag” and be very wary about proceeding further.

Second, the property owner cannot necessarily be legally bound by what they disclose or include in the statement as it is simply designed for them to complete as best they can. There is no guarantee about the accuracy or the veracity of what a prospective buyer may or may not include.

The bottom line is that a PDS may actually not be as helpful as you think if you believe you have been deceived and want to take legal action against the previous owner. You may end shelling out a lot of legal expenses and end up having nothing to show for it except a big legal bill and expensive renovation or repair costs.

A PDS should only be used a guide and you need to check out the home further. Unless you are an experience contractor yourself, your best bet is to take the time and use an experienced home inspector to poke into the recesses of the home and uncover any potential problems they have found.

 

The rise of the miserable Canadian homeowner – Ask a Vancouver Mortgage Broker

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

ROB CARRICK – The Globe and Mail

Consider the financial misery factor before you buy a house.

Vancouver Mortgage Broker

A poll to be released Tuesday by Manulife Bank indicates that almost 30 per cent of homeowners are very unhappy with how they’ve managed their debt and day-to-day finances in 2013, and only 43 per cent are very happy.
(Martti Salmela/iStockphoto)

That’s where the constraints of paying a mortgage and all the other usual costs of living leave you feeling frustrated and unhappy about your finances. Even real estate agents concede that such a phenomenon exists. “It’s been disturbing to watch runaway housing prices weigh down young families, constrain their daily lives, and make it near impossible for children to live in the same city as their parents,” a Toronto realtor said in a recent e-mail.

A poll to be released Tuesday by Manulife Bank amplifies this sense of a home handcuffing you financially. It indicates that almost 30 per cent of homeowners are very unhappy with how they’ve managed their debt and day-to-day finances in 2013, and only 43 per cent are very happy.

There are multiple explanations of why so many homeowners are unhappy with their finances. Some lack the restraint to live within their means, and then give in to inertia instead of taking action. The decline of middle class prosperity, which is being well covered in a Globe and Mail investigation called The Wealth Paradox, also plays a role. So do central bankers, who have created a new normal of irresistibly low interest rates to bridge us across the economic stagnation caused by the financial crisis five years ago.

But if homeowners are dissatisfied about how they’re managing their finances, we must also consider their single largest expense on month-by-month basis. That would be the mortgage payments they’re making on their homes.

The problem with housing is that it’s expensive compared to our incomes. I will document this further in an upcoming column, but for now let’s just say that mortgages plus other basic costs of day-to-day living, such as cars and daycare, may leave us with little money left over. And so we borrow more through credit lines and credit cards. That’s our unofficial second income.

The Manulife survey shows homeowners are not happy about how things are working out, which is noteworthy. We’ve been borrowing madly as a nation for the better part of five years now, and the story has so far been cast as one of imprudent behaviour. Here, we get a sense that there’s a cost in stress and angst.

This is particularly true for younger Canadians, according to Manulife. In the age 30 to 39 range, just when people are buying first houses, 38 per cent of homeowners are very happy with their debt management and 31 per cent are very unhappy.

Manulife believes these people can address their problems with better debt management techniques and solid advice. Maybe so. If they cut spending or use a budget, they could pay extra money down against their debt principal and get out of debt sooner. Consolidating high-cost debts in a low-rate line of credit or mortgage refinancing may also help.

But the best way of managing debt is to keep it under control from the get-go, and that brings us back to housing. The October resale housing numbers showed a modest pullback in sales nationally from the previous month, and that had some market watchers saying the market is slowing but stable because of reasonable levels of affordability.

If houses are affordable, then why are so many homeowners unhappy about their financial situation? We should talk more about this because we’re not living in a rising economy that lifts all households. Wage and salary increases aren’t raining down on us. Moreover, interest rates will at some point start to rise and make it even more difficult to manage our debts.

Will the financial burden of home ownership ease as you get older and presumably earn more? Depressingly, Manulife found that only 51 per cent of homeowners feel they will be able to retire debt-free.

Too many of us still think owning a house brings financial security and, in the past, it most certainly did. But houses have become so expensive in some cities that they now bring financial insecurity for those without well above average incomes.

Forget my lectures on this for a moment and listen to the silent voices recorded in the Manulife poll. A total of 2,132 homeowners aged 30 to 59 with household income of more than $50,000 were interviewed in September. Almost one in three of them isvery unhappy with how they’re managing their finances. Remember these voices if you’re stretching to buy a home.

Follow me on Twitter: @rcarrick

 

Chill out, retirement pessimists: Should we worry about seniors living in poverty?- Consult with a Vancouver Mortgage Broker

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

ROB CARRICK – The Globe and Mail

The best of the web on money, markets and all things financial, as chosen daily by Globe and Mail personal finance columnist Rob Carrick.

Vancouver Mortgage BrokerChill out, retirement pessimists
Some perspective can be found here on the debate about how badly prepared Canadians are for retirement. The poverty rate among seniors has fallen drastically since the late 1970s, although it has moved up a little recently.

Should we worry about seniors living in poverty?

The truth is few Canadians spend their senior years worried about basic living expenses. This has been lost in the retirement income debate.

One in five Canadians is worried about being able to cover basic living expenses in retirement. I reported this to audiences in Regina and Saskatoon last week, where I was invited to present the findings of our Sun Life Unretirement™ Index. But while it’s true that 22% told us that they are “not at all confident” about their ability to cover these expenses — and while it’s also true that another 49% said they are only “somewhat confident” — these Canadians are almost certainly more worried than they need to be. Despite the sometimes-overwrought debate about Canada’s retirement income system, we live in a country considered a world leader in the fight against senior citizen poverty. We have made tremendous progress on this front, thanks largely to the Canada Pension Plan (CPP), Quebec Pension Plan (QPP) and Old Age Security (OAS) programs.

I don’t mean to suggest that there aren’t ways to improve the retirement income system. I’m just saying we owe it to one another to be clear about the fact that few Canadian seniors live in poverty.

More on CPP and OAS in a moment.

Statistics Canada’s low-income data show that poverty rates among seniors fell off dramatically between the 1970s and 1990s. Our low-income measure (LIM) rate hit 33.1% in 1977. It fell to 3.7% in 1995, and has since climbed back up to 11.5% in 2009.

We saw these numbers begin to fall in the late 1970s, because that was when the first Canadians began receiving full CPP benefits. The rate fell further as members of workplace plans — which grew in number during the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s — began to retire.

Certainly it is worrisome that the LIM rate has risen since 1995. Still, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) ranks Canada third-best among OECD countries in terms of providing seniors an adequate standard of living. In most OECD countries, the poverty rate is highest among children and seniors. Working-age citizens tend to have the lowest poverty rates, in percentage terms. It’s a different story in Canada, where the lowest percentage is among the elderly. We can thank CPP/QPP and OAS for much of this.

Working Canadians contribute to CPP and QPP with help from their employers. They pay out retirement, disability and death benefits to eligible recipients. A couple of specifics:

  • You can collect CPP/QPP as early as age 60, although doing so will permanently reduce the monthly income you receive. The standard age to begin collecting CPP is 65. If you hold off, you’re paid more each month. You can delay receiving CPP payments until you’re 70.
  • Your monthly cheque is based on how much you contributed and for how long. According to the Government of Canada website, the average monthly payout in March 2013 for a new pension taken at 65 was $596.66. The maximum monthly amount this year is $1,012,50. The same maximum applies to QPP.

OAS and the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) are available to eligible Canadians regardless of their past or present employment status. Canadian residents quality if they’re 65 or older, a Canadian citizen or legal resident and they’ve lived in Canada for a minimum 10 years since turning 18. Non-residents qualify if they’re 65 or older, they were a Canadian citizen or legal resident before leaving the country and they’ve lived here at least 20 years since turning 18.

OAS benefits change each quarter. The maximum monthly OAS pension amount in Q2 2013 was $546.07. Depending on your income, an amount (up to 100%) of your OAS pension may be clawed back. Low-income Canadian residents are also eligible for the GIS. In Q2 2013, the top monthly GIS payout was $740.44. Visit this Government of Canada web page for details on OAS and GIS payments.

These are only high-level details, of course. For more information, visit these government web pages on CPP,QPP and OAS and consult a financial advisor.

 

Home Series: Some Vancouver Decorating Trends for 2014 – Consult with Bruce Coleman, Vancouver Mortgage Broker

Canadian Mortgage News

CMI 101 Series

Dreyer Group 101 Series

Financial FYI Series

First Time Buyers

Home Buying 101

Home Insurance

Latest News

Mortgage Rates

Refinancing

Retirement Planning

Self Employed

Some Vancouver Decorating Trends for 2014

Vancouver Mortgage BrokerWith so many ideas floating around about what decorating styles to use in creating your ideal living space, it’s hard to know which way to go. Everyone’s sense of style and taste versus what they can afford to spend on decorating varies.

Every year, the decorating industry experts and style gurus come up with a whole new approach in terms of setting the new trends for themes and colours. As this year closes and 2014 approaches the old trends are put out on the back burner.

But, each New Year provides new ideas to incorporate into decorating your home to achieve a whole new look and maybe even a much fresher approach.

Here are what some of the decorating gurus are saying will be the in-thing for the coming year.

Colours

Here are some the hottest colours that are going to dominate in 2014.

Light Greens and Blues

Both are excellent color choices especially if you chose to go with a monochromatic style. Both colours tend to be very soothing. Blue is especially calming and you can go with something lighter like a teal blue, a light blue or even a turquoise. Blue seems to the in thing especially for living rooms and bedrooms.

Yellow and Orange

Yellow is a bold and sunny colour which is great for opening up smaller rooms or brightening up rooms which have exposure to the sun. Orange is also expected to be quite popular in 2014 and can add some fire and vigour to any room. Don’t go too bright though as that might too overwhelming. The gurus suggest a more subdued hue of yellow or orange might be more appealing.

White

White never really goes out of style especially again if you’re going with a monochromatic motif. White doesn’t have to too boring or sterile though because you can temper it and add some contrast such as creams or nude colours.

Pink

We’re not talking “shocking pink” here so don’t that your guy is going think it’s going to be too frilly. Some of these muted pink colour versions are incredibly appealing to the eye and blend in nicely in any living space.

What Else is In for Decorating in 2014?

Some of the other ideas put forth by the experts include the following:

Using More Metals

Metals have been relatively popular for several seasons, but for 2014, it’s not just going to the standard ones used in the past because the new focus is expected to be on brass in the coming year. This is considered a metal which has a warm appeal and can be incorporated into your home in a variety of different ways.

Art

Art is really going to huge this year. Not only can it be a great investment, art can really accent a room and the nice thing about it is that you can incorporate the art to reflect your own tastes. Traditional paintings always work but if you consider abstract pieces such as sculptures or abstract paintings you can also blend these either nicely into the overall colour scheme or use them as focal pieces. And, don’t forget that “bold” can also fit in if you do it right…

Fabrics

Cotton, wool and polyesters aren’t going to do it this year. The decorating seers are suggesting you be a bit more dynamic and go with either silk or even velvet to add a touch of elegance to your space.

Period Pieces

To add some contrast to newer furniture and even to give your room an extra bit of charm or use as contrast, an antique piece may give your room that extra bit of flair. Antiques can be anything from silver knick knacks to an eclectic armoire, or anything in between.


SEO Powered By SEOPressor